Apple iTunes
Perceptions in Sound

Apr 6, 2009 | Posted Under: Thinking

A few days ago, I practiced for a couple of hours in a hall here in Madrid. As I walked out of the hall and headed for the subway station to go home, I was lost in my thoughts about the music I had been working on. Humming under my breath, I revisited a phrase from the Chopin B minor sonata in my head and walked rather obliviously toward the station. It wasn’t until I got home later that evening, that I saw on the news that I had walked right past a rather large and vocal protest. I vaguely recalled seeing some police officers and people on the street, but the scene, and more importantly, the sounds from that very loud protest had simply not registered as I walked past. I have previously posted on this blog my thoughts on the differences between hearing and listening. As I thought about how I perceive sounds in different ways depending upon the situation, I wanted to revisit this issue.

During my practice sessions, I become so absorbed in what I’m doing that I will not hear the phone ring or realize when someone is speaking to me. When I was younger, this was the cause of a lot of laughter in my family. My mother would actually have to touch me before I would lift my eyes away from the piano, look at her, and then realize that she’s actually saying something to me. My brother’s favorite past time was to come up behind me while I was practicing and scare the living daylights out of me. Of course, it’s not that I don’t actually hear the sound - rather, it’s more like my active “listening” is so focused on what I’m working on that any other extraneous sound from my surroundings simply does not register in my head, or enter my sphere of attention. The sounds around me are filtered through the “hearing” part of my brain and doesn’t get processed in the “listening” section.

The exact opposite situation happens when I perform. As I sit at the piano on stage, every sound from the hall or audience - the rustle of a skirt, the turning of a page in the program, the sound of someone whispering to their neighbor, a raspy cough, the crinkling of a candy wrapper or cough drop - becomes unbelievably magnified, and I feel as though a megaphone is directly attached to my ear and is amplifying every sound from my surroundings. In this case, my listening becomes so active and sensitive to the acoustics, vibe, and subtle nuances of the space within which I am about to produce music, that every other sound also gets caught in my “listening net” and feels like an incredible intrusion or interference. It is the same when I rehearse in a hall prior to a performance - if someone enters the hall or walks nearby, I feel the energy of the space drastically shift. This is the reason why I usually request that my rehearsals be closed so that I have the needed “alone” time on the day of a performance to absorb the space of the hall.

This difference also permeates into the periods after I make music. After I practice, rehearse, or perform, it takes me at least an hour to come down from the music-induced listening (the reason for my experience on the street the other day). I remain in a rather spacey state in which I’m still occupied with listening to music (even if it’s just in my head), and everything else immediately goes into the section of my brain reserved for background noise. After about an hour or so, my sound perceptions start to shift back to its normal equilibrium.

I am fascinated with how music, or any type of endeavor that requires one to reach internally for a higher degree of awareness , can cause a shift by bringing some elements to the foreground while pushing others to the back. This holds true whether I am the one making music or the one experiencing it. For example, I cannot listen to a wonderful recording while I do small tasks or errands around the house. A powerful recording will demand my attention, push itself to the front, and will not settle into the fuzzy realm of “background noise.” I cannot continue to wash dishes or cook - I have to actually sit down, listen, and absorb what is being said.

Whether it’s the composition or interpretation of a musician, the speech of an orator, the words of a writer, or the visual world of a painter, choreographer, or director, art places demands on both the creator and his audience. It insists that we shift our perceptions from passive to active, that we listen rather than simply hear, and that we search rather than accept.

  1. April 6th, 2009 | 12:17 pm

    Hi Grace!
    This is my first comment here. I’m struck with one of your comments here: “Of course, it’s not that I don’t actually hear the sound”, but still being surprised by nearby people having to touch you or to jump out of nowhere to get your notice.

    One of the biggest issues I have with my playing involves this. I’m very focused on what I want to play but that doesn’t mean that I’m very focused on what I’m playing. Do you think that aspects of our playing may happen and still go unheard, because “we’re focusing on what we think we’re playing”?

  2. GN:
    April 6th, 2009 | 12:37 pm

    Thanks for your comment Ren - I think there is a very large difference between hearing and listening. I was trying to say that although I may hear something, it doesn’t necessarily mean that I register it in my mind. When we hear things, I believe that it is a very passive process - meaning we can hear sounds, hear what we are playing, but it is possible for it to not truly register, and it does not involve really any effort on our parts. We hear things all the time - voices and sounds outside, background music, traffic noise, etc. Students often say to me that they are “listening” to themselves and focused on what they are producing as they play. I usually tell them that they are “hearing” and not “listening”. Listening involves something active - it means actually searching for a sound, vibration, something beyond the sounds that are already coming to your ears. When we truly listen, I believe it takes away this disparity that people often feel between what they think they’re playing and what is actually being produced because a kind of alignment is created as a result of the heightened level of awareness. Perhaps to “listen” means to not passively take in the sounds that are already being made (whether it’s your playing or any other sounds), but rather to continuously, consciously, and actively search for a sound, a shading, or a nuance that has not been made yet.

  3. April 6th, 2009 | 10:53 pm

    What a quick reply :)
    So there’s a place to explore: listening. But maybe more than that? ‘Active listening’ perhaps? After the mechanics and the overall interpretation of a piece are settled, I try not to listen to what I’m playing, but to listen to what I’m missing. I listen to what I’m leaving outside my playing and then experiment with it, bringing it to my interpretation. Sometimes this means playing different from other people, which creates tension and even a sidelook from the ones who know more, in the audience. Sometimes, thought and feeling make you agree with the regular playing. However, it’s probably the biggest fun of playing: not to repeat endlessly what others have done without considering the best possibility.

Leave a Reply




Your Comment


Want to find something?


Twittering...

Heartfelt concern for those devastated in Chile and hoping my dearest family and friends are all staying safe in Hawaii... 2010-02-27

» follow me on twitter

Photography

I love taking photos - here are my most recent on Flickr.


Backstage @ Flickr

My Latest CD

Grace Nikae: Chopin | Schumann: Sonatas
Grace Nikae: Chopin | Schumann: Sonatas | more info »

Purchase/Download at:

Recent Links

Reading...

Death of Virgil
Death of Virgil
- Hermann Broch

Upcoming

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Get Updates by E-mail: